EU fails to agree on European Commission’s glyphosate license renewal

Published by Niall Sargent on

November 9th, 2017

The European Commission and the EU Member States have again failed to agree on the European Commission’s proposal for a five-year extension for glyphosate.

A vote on the proposal at this morning’s meeting of the Commission’s Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed failed to a reach a qualified majority.

The same proposal or an amended one will now be submitted to an appeal committee by the end of November for another vote. If there is no qualified majority in this vote, the European Commission will be tasked with making a decision itself. The license for glyphosate is set to expire on 15 December 2017.

Fourteen countries, including Ireland, are reported as having voted in favor of the proposal, with nine against and five, including Germany, abstaining. At last month’s Committee meeting, sixteen Member States voted in favor of the renewal, including Ireland.

Luxembourg’s Environment Minister Carole Dieschbourg tweeted this morning that her country had voted against the proposal. She said that the result of today’s vote is a “good outcome for our health and environment”.

Food and farming campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, Adrian Bebb,  said that the decision indicates that “overwhelming public pressure is paying off”.

“When the final decision comes around, there’s only one responsible option – take it off the market immediately, and support farmers to help them get off the chemical treadmill,” he added.

Last month, the European Parliament yesterday backed a full ban on glyphosate-based herbicides by December 2022.

Over 350 MEPs voted in favour of the motion, which also seeks a complete ban on household use and a ban on farming use when biological alternatives work well for weed control.

MEPs did back a Commission plan to limit the amount cadmium – classed as carcinogenic to humans – allowed in mineral fertiliser products sold across Europe to 20mg/kg.

Cautious welcome from NGOs

The Parliament’s proposal is a “breath of fresh air” according to Greenpeace EU food policy director Franziska Achterberg, although she said that that the phase-out period is “longer than technically needed”.

Friends of the Earth Ireland Director Oisin Coghlan welcomed the move, while also stating that he “would have preferred a short lead-in period to the ban”.

“The Commission needs [to] copper-fasten the deadline for the phrase out of glyphosate in no more than 5 years,” said Mr Coghlan.

Ms Achterberg said that it is time for the Commission and national governments to listen to the people of Europe who support a ban on glyphosate.

A petition signed by 1.3 million people across Europe was delivered to the European Commission (EC) in July calling on the EU to ban glyphosate.

The petition also called on the EC to reform the pesticide approval procedure and to set EU-wide mandatory reduction targets for pesticide use.

RoundUp Monsanto Photo: Mike Mozart

Glyphosate Controversy 

The EU risk assessment process of renewing the substance’s license has been mired in controversy.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization, classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans in 2015.

However, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has said that there isn’t enough scientific evidence currently available to prove that glyphosate causes cancer, with the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) arriving at the same conclusion in November 2015.

However, in a letter sent to EC President Jean-Claude Juncker in March, a group of 30 MEPs questioned the validity of a study used by the EFSA in its assessment. According to the letter, the study was co-authored by a former Monsanto employee.

Monsanto Papers

Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup product, the world’s most widely used herbicide.

MEPs discussed the “Monsanto Papers” at a public ENVI hearing last month. The Papers include a host of documents from US regulators and US scientists, as well as thousands of pages of internal Monsanto emails, memos and other documents.

Speaking at the hearing, investigative journalist Carey Gillam of U.S. Right to Know said that the Monsanto Papers highlights how Monsanto has “ghostwritten research papers that assert glyphosate safety for publication and regulatory review”.

She also said that the Paper reveals how Monsanto “enlisted” three EPA officials to block a 2015 Glyphosate Review by the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry that “Monsanto said would likely agree with IARC”.

[x_author title=”About the Author”]

Related Post
Low pesticide exposure found among horticulture workers

December 14th, 2018 Scientists from NUI Galway have found low levels of glyphosate exposure among professional gardeners and amenity horticultural Read more

Some councils to trial alternatives to controversial glyphosate

August 24th, 2018 Earlier this month, a San Francisco court ordered Monsanto to pay out $289m to a terminally ill Read more

Monsanto ordered to pay out $289m in San Francisco cancer case

August 11th, 2018 Monsanto has been ordered to pay $289m in damages to a former school groundskeeper who was diagnosed Read more

A necessary evil? The farming view on glyphosate
Tractor spreading pesticides against weed. Photo: Pixabay.

August 8th, 2018 The license for glyphosate was renewed for five years last November by the European Commission. Glyphosate is Read more

Niall Sargent

Niall is the Editor of The Green News. He is a multimedia journalist, with an MA in Investigative Journalism from City University, London