US Government slashing environmental protection laws to build border wall

Published by Michael Hauschild on

February 5th, 2018

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has waived 26 environmental laws in order to smooth the way for the construction of a border wall with Mexico in order to reduce illegal border crossing.

The Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen announced the decision in a governmental notice at the end of last month to ensure the “expeditious construction” of roads and physical barriers in the El Paso region of New Mexico.

According to the DHS that there is an”immediate need to construct border barriers and roads” as the El Paso sector has seen “over 25,000 illegal aliens” apprehended, 67,000 pounds of marijuana, as well as 157 pounds of cocaine seized, in 2016.

“I have determined that it is necessary that I exercise the authority that is vested in me,” Ms Nielsen said in the notice and proceeded listing the laws to be removed to speed up the construction process.

The notice continues: “While the waiver eliminates DHS’ obligation to comply with various laws with respect to covered projects, DHS remains committed to environmental stewardship.  DHS has been coordinating and consulting, and intends to continue doing so, with other federal and state resource agencies to ensure that impacts to the environment, wildlife, and cultural and historic artifacts are analyzed and minimized, to the extent possible.”

Mexico–United States barrier at the border of Tijuana, Mexico and San Diego, USA Photo: Tomas Castelazo

Mexico–United States barrier at the border of Tijuana, Mexico and San Diego, USA Photo: Tomas Castelazo

The protective statutes to be abrogated concern the likes of habitats, water, birds, waste, fish, and wildlife, with Acts like the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act and the National Fish and Wildlife Act being waived for the construction of the border wall with Mexico.

Additionally, The Washington Post reported last week that the White House intends to significantly reduce requirements of environmental reviews for new projects as part of a new infrastructure plan.

The proposal asks to simplify impact assessments for new projects in order to make the process less costly and more time efficient. This will likely result in a less holistic evaluation of environmental impacts of proposed developments like roads or pipelines.

These actions are the latest of numerous measures implemented by the current administration that contradict environmental protection concerns.

For example, last year the White House reduced the size of some national parks, in part to allow coal mining, as well as proposals to extend oil drillings and repeal carbon emission guidelines.

[x_author title=”About the Author”]

Related Post
Trump resort refused permission for Doonbeg wall
President of the United States Donald Trump speaking at the 2017 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland.

March 18th, 2020 The Doonbeg golf resort owned by US President Donald Trump has been refused permission by An Bord Read more

The Climate Cases: Generation Z makes its voice heard
YOUTHvGOV Rally Photo: Christian O'Rourke

February 6th, 2018 After covering the success of the Urgenda case, and the ongoing Swiss Grannies battle with their Government, Read more

Opinion: Trudeau and the Environment – ‘Trump with better hair’
trump trudeau environment

July 10th, 2017 Since his election as leader of the Canadian government in 2015, Justin Trudeau has been celebrated as Read more

Irish Politicians extremely concerned by Trump’s Paris Agreement decision

June 1st, 2017 President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement has been met with concern and Read more

Michael Hauschild

Michael has a background in Biology and is interested in environmental issues, with a focus on climate change & environmental law.